Montana Is Sending Troubled Kids to Out-of-State Programs That Have Been Accused of Abuse


The high demfor treatment for children with behavioral substance abuse problems has led Montana health officials to spend Medicaid funds to send kids, including those who are foster children wards of the state, to residential programs in other states with less stringent oversight.

Some of those children have been sent to out-of-state programs that have been accused of abuse mistreatment, according to documents from state agencies media reports.

Shipping those kids out of state for treatment for behavioral substance use disorders comes with a high price tag, often the children’s issues are not resolved or are even worse, said Michael Chavers, CEO of Yellowstone Boys Girls Ranch. “When they return to us, they return with worse outcomes for higher cost,” Chavers told Montana lawmakers last fall.

In 2019, Montana increased its oversight of private alternative treatment programs for young people, abolishing an industry-controlled oversight board making the programs subject to Montana Department of Public Health Human Services’ regulations inspections. By the end of 2020, 11 of the 19 programs operating in Montana had closed.

This month, approximately 90 children from Montana were attending facilities approved by Montana’s Medicaid program in 10 other states, according to state officials. The facilities were in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Utah, Wyoming.

By comparison, Medicaid paid for 171 Montana children to be treated at in-state psychiatric residential facilities 407 kids to live in in-state therapeutic group homes during the state’s previous fiscal year, which ended June 30, according to health department officials.

Nearly all the out-of-state programs that have been approved by Montana’s Medicaid program are currently housing kids from Montana have faced allegations of abuse or have histories of noncompliance with state regulations, according to state documents, inspection reports, investigations by news organizations.

Jon Ebelt, a Montana health department spokesperson, confirmed that there have been reports of abuse or neglect of young people from Montana at out-of-state facilities during the past two years, although he did not specify which facilities or how many reports. In some cases, Montana has moved young people from out-of-state programs because of concerns about facilities, he added, without providing details.

The state where an allegation of abuse or neglect of a Montana child occurs is responsible for investigating it, Ebelt said.

Why Out of State?

The majority of children attending out-of-state Medicaid-funded treatment facilities are sent by their parents or guardians, although some are referred by the state health department’s Child Family Services Division or by the state’s juvenile justice system as wards of the state, Ebelt said.

Kids are sent to programs out of state because of a lack of available beds at in-state facilities stemming from the state’s low rate of reimbursement staffing shortages, said program administrators of Montana’s psychiatric residential treatment facilities therapeutic group homes. In-state providers are reimbursed an average of $405 per day per child, while out-of-state providers are reimbursed an average of $615 per day per child.

For the fiscal year that ended June 30, Montana spent a total of $12.6 million for out-of-state psychiatric residential treatment facility stays $4.7 million for out-of-state therapeutic group home stays, Ebelt said.

“It is always our preference to serve youth with serious emotional disturbances in or near their home communities,” Ebelt said. “However, sometimes, due to a variety of factors, including acuity of symptoms, need for specialized care, or in-state bed availability, youth are referred to out-of-state providers.”

Among the programs eligible for Montana Medicaid that are currently housing kids from Montana is Provo Canyon School in Utah, where Paris Hilton hundreds of other students have alleged they were abused, according to lawsuits, former students who have shared accusations about abuse at the program, news organizations’ investigations, state documents. Those allegations led Utah to increase oversight of residential youth programs.

When reached for comment, Provo Canyon School sent a statement, last updated in August 2021, that says Provo does not “condone or promote any form of abuse” that the program is “committed to providing high-quality care to youth with special, often complex, emotional, behavioral psychiatric needs.”

Montana is also sending kids to another Utah facility, Falcon Ridge Ranch, an employee of which was arrested charged with multiple counts of sexual battery distributing harmful material to minors in March 2021, according to the St. George Spectrum & Daily News. The employee pleaded guilty to three misdemeanor counts of sexual battery in a plea agreement with prosecutors in January, said Cade Stubbs, the clerk of court for Utah’s 5th District Court. Falcon Ridge Ranch was owned by Sequel Youth Family Services at the time, is now owned by Rite of Passage.

Minnesota, Oregon, Marylstopped sending children to Sequel programs after the May 2020 death of a 16-year-old student at a Michigan facility. Cornelius Frederick died after staff members restrained him at Sequel’s now-closed Lakeside Academy, according to an investigation report by Michigan child welfare officials. California Washington also severed ties with Sequel after an article published by APM Reports in September 2020 detailed abuse noncompliance with state regulations at Sequel facilities across the country.

An investigation by The Imprint the San Francisco Chronicle found that of the hundreds of alleged violations or deficiencies at Sequel facilities that child welfare officials in California other states have investigated, more than 75% resulted in confirmation by state authorities that violations had occurred.

Officials from Sequel did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

Regulatory Confusion

A January report from the federal Government Accountability Office found that monitoring out-of-state youth treatment facilities is difficult because of “state challenges in collecting reporting facility-level information.” It also found that different definitions of maltreatment, fear of retaliation, the inability of the residents to communicate with others outside the program posed challenges for reporting maltreatment data collection.

The report found that federal agencies have been inconsistent in addressing state federal program noncompliance recommended improved state oversight stronger enforcement to hold facilities accountable.

Oregon state Sen. Sara Gelser Blouin, a Democrat from Corvallis, experienced those regulatory problems firsthwhen she was investigating reports that Oregon children had been mistreated at Sequel’s Northern Illinois Academy in 2019.

Gelser Blouin said she contacted Oregon’s abuse investigator the state health department but found no agency officials able to investigate the matter. Gelser Blouin then contacted officials in Illinois she thought might have the authority to investigate Northern Illinois Academy, with the same result.

“Nobody thought they had the authority to investigate,” Gelser Blouin said. “They just kept saying, ‘Well they’re accredited by the Joint Commission.’ So I called the Joint Commission, the Joint Commission told me that they are not a ‘Betty Crocker seal of approval’ for child safety.”

The Joint Commission is a private organization that accredits health care organizations programs in the United States is funded primarily by the fees it charges facilities for accreditation. In some states, accreditation from the Joint Commission can relieve treatment facilities of oversight from most other organizations.

At Gelser Blouin’s request, the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services initiated an unannounced survey of Northern Illinois Academy. CMS surveyors declared all the kids at Northern Illinois Academy at immediate risk of serious injury or death.

One month earlier, in November 2019, the Joint Commission had reaccredited all Sequel facilities, including Northern Illinois Academy, in a pilot systemwide accreditation.

Northern Illinois Academy closed last year after a state-funded report by a disability-rights organization documented allegations of abuse neglect, leading the state to remove all the kids in its care.

Oregon California Lead With Bans

Oregon California are the only states that have passed legislation to prevent young people from being placed in facilities that are not overseen by a youth’s home state.

California banned the practice of sending foster children charged with crimes to out-of-state programs in July 2021. That same month, Oregon, driven largely by the work of Gelser Blouin, became the first only state to require any out-of-state facility housing Oregon children to comply with Oregon regulations be licensed by the Oregon Department of Human Services.

Gelser Blouin is now working with other youth rights advocates, including Paris Hilton, to champion a federal bill called the Accountability for Congregate Care Act. It would establish standard regulations common definitions for abuse treatment across the states identify the rights of children in institutional settings.

The bill would also create a federal database to track placements of young people, critical incident reports, complaints, among other information. Currently, complaints against programs are funneled through various state agencies accrediting bodies.

In Montana, for example, Ebelt said complaints about out-of-state programs housing Montana’s young people can be filed in various ways “due to the various people entities who interact with or have oversight of out-of-state programs.”

The bill would also define different types of programs, which Caroline Lorson, an advocate working on the federal legislation, said is at the heart of the need for change.

“They all have different requirements, they all have different standards, they all have different agencies that interact with them, that’s why they’ve been hard to regulate,” Lorson said.

Related Topics

Contact Us

Submit a Story Tip



Source link