‘Centre emasculating tribunals by not making appointments,’ says SC




The Supreme Court Monday said the Centre was “emasculating” tribunals by not appointing official to the quasi-judicial bodies which are facing severe crunch of presiding officers as well as judicial technical members sought action on the matter by September 13.


Asserting that it did not want any confrontation with the government, a special bench headed by Chief Justice N V Ramana said it wanted the Centre to make some appointments to the tribunals facing huge vacancies.





There are around 250 posts lying vacant at various key tribunals appellate tribunals such as NCLT, DRT, TDSAT andT.


You are emasculating the tribunals by not making the appointments, said the bench, also comprising Justices D Y Chandrachud L Nageswara Rao.


The court took note of the submissions of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, adjourned the hearing on a batch of pleas pertaining to the vacancies at the tribunals a new law related to them for further hearing on September 13 saying, We hope the appointments will be made by then.


It is clear that you do not want to respect the judgments of this court. Now, we have the option to stay the Tribunal Reforms Act or close down the tribunals or we ourselves appoint the people or the next option is to initiate the contempt of courts proceedings.., the bench said.


We do not want confrontation with the government we are happy with the way the nine Supreme Court judges were appointed. The entire legal fraternity appreciated this…these tribunals are collapsing with no members or chairperson. Tell us about your alternative plans, it observed.


Mehta said the government does not want any confrontation either sought time on the grounds that Attorney General K K Venugopal, who has been assisting the bench in these matters, has been facing some personal difficulties.


The top court also issued notices on several fresh pleas including the one filed by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh challenging the Constitutional validity of various provisions of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021, which was passed during the recent Monsoon Session of Parliament received Presidential assent on August 13.


Ramesh said he has filed the petition in public interest assailing the proviso to Section 3(1) along with Sections 3(7), 5 7(1) of the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 as being ultra-vires Articles 14, 21 50 of the Constitution.


The top court on August 16 had termed “serious” the passage of Bill on tribunals with the provisions, struck down earlier, without any debate in Parliament.


The court had then granted 10 days to the Centre to make appointments to the tribunals.


The bench had given details of pending vacancies in 15 quasi-judicial bodies such as Debt Recovery Tribunals (DRTs), DRAT, Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), Telecom Disputes Settlement Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) National Companies Law Appellate Tribunal or NCLAT.


There are 19 vacant positions of presiding officers or the chairman in these tribunals, besides 110 111 posts of judicial technical members respectively lying vacant, the bench had said.

(Only the headline picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information commentary on developments that are of interest to you have wider political economic implications for the country the world. Your encouragement constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed updated with credible news, authoritative views incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better more relevant content. We believe in free, fair credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor



Source link